Now students are less and less supported

Individualised, concern increasing access to employment, accountability... The student of today has changed behavior, but social status.

The student of 2006 is very different from that of a few years ago How has it changed

The status of the student, his position in society has evolved. Formerly, he had somehow share status. Student life was a kind of "enchanted parenthesis" between high school and working life. Today, the graduate studies are generalized, or at least very widespread: it is almost an entire class who has access. Result, there is a form of trivialization of the student condition. Found on the campus of students from all social media, of the more affluent to the more modest.

Then, the behavior of students has changed him also. In the past, they could simply follow their course, relatively passively. They were not really actors even if asked to be as efficient as possible and were a bit patronized. Now, students are less and less supported. They have the choice to make stream, permanently option, of course to organize their courses based on their project. And their journey is largely individualised in large schools as at the University.

The concern of the insertion in the professional life really change the behavior of students

The question of opportunities and the insertion in the professional life is more present, to the curriculum, and sometimes even from the tray. Each must determine and organise its education with point focus, access to employment. Obviously, recurrent criticism for inefficiency and gaps in our referral system are beginning to bear fruit. Student life is now much more ground internships in business, stays abroad, periods of hiatus... Students conduct now goes and comes between the University or the high school and the world of enterprise, the alternation. Their studies are more practical, concrete, designed to prepare for a job. They are brought to behave, in a certain way, in présalariés. Result, they became realistic, or even more strategists. In short, they are are "verifiable".

Students have a better knowledge the company. Is the image of it actually improved on campus

Of course, students are better informed than previously on what is active living. They now have regular contacts with the company. But that students are aware of this universe, it is most often through low paid internships, and odd, etc. Also the rating of the company has not benefited from the attendance: it has not really attracted their membership. They still don't like the company, but for different reasons from those of the past. In the past, this breakdown was explained by the lack of knowledge of the company. Now, he is more the fruit of the experience through internships including. They are not illusions.

More broadly, observed in students a lack of interest quite pronounced for macroeconomics and even, in General, a distrust from the economic universe. It is before any carrier, in their eyes, bad news: unemployment, de-skilling, the damage to the environment, the workload... We must acknowledge, as young people and citizens, students often have a fairly cynical vision of the company and the economy a close enough vision of "economic horror" Dear Viviane Forrester.

One has the feeling that requirements that weigh on the shoulders of students increase continuously. Do asked them not too

Asked, in effect, to acquire reflexes that are those of the professional world very early, and apply very quickly in the life active the knowledge they have acquired on the campus. To be, in a sense, young adults. This going in the right direction Is - this benefit for their training For the company I'm not sure. After all, have a period where one does not have to worry about his professional integration, is perhaps not pointless... But this is not for me to judge.